Transduction threading macro? (streamer)

Questions & Help General Questions
1

I’ve been trying to get myself to use transducers more in my code b/c they seem like they slot in easily and give an easy performance boost - but the notation feels a lil clunky and I end up dropping back to just normal -> / ->> threading.

I then came across this transducer threading macro

However it doesn’t seem to have gotten any traction. Has anyone had experience using this? Are there any immediate drawbacks or gotchas I should look out for?

To me the solution looks very natural, so I feel like I’m maybe missing some issues b/c I’m a bit murky on transducer

2 Likes
2

I think injest takes this to its logical conclusion, and adds some opt-in pathing semantics as well as parallelism.

3 Likes
3

Wow that looks amazing. Thank you for showing me that. Not only transducers, but parralellization as well… and some fantastic fixes to everyday annoyances with vanilla threading

I feel I’m going to be using this everywhere!

4

This topic was automatically closed 182 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.